Social-emotional competencies and coexistence in educational contexts: toward a relational, preventive, and restorative ecology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70577/cieninter.v4i4.157Keywords:
social-emotional competencies; school coexistence; social and emotional learning; school climate; restorative practices; inclusive education.Abstract
Coexistence in educational settings is a relational, cultural, and institutional phenomenon that cannot be reduced to rule compliance or the absence of violence. Its sustainability largely depends on the capacities to recognize and regulate emotions, understand different perspectives, build trusting relationships, deliberate in the face of dilemmas, and repair harm within relationships. This article aims to analyze the relationship between social-emotional competencies and educational coexistence and to integrate their main dimensions into a conceptual proposal applicable to schools. An integrative narrative review of scientific literature and institutional documents was conducted, focusing mainly on publications from 2015 to 2025 and seminal contributions on social and emotional learning, school climate, and restorative practices. The material was organized through thematic-comparative analysis around four areas: intrapersonal competencies, interpersonal competencies, institutional conditions, and constructive conflict management. The documentary findings suggest that social-emotional competencies are associated with better conditions for interaction, belonging, safety, and participation, although their effects depend on cultural relevance, pedagogical continuity, and institutional coherence. As an original contribution, the Relational Ecology for Educational Coexistence model (ERCE) is proposed, comprising five interconnected dimensions: personal awareness and regulation, recognition and care for others, communication and cooperation, restorative conflict management, and institutional and community co-responsibility. The article concludes that coexistence should be understood as a collective capacity that is taught, practiced, assessed, and reconstructed on a daily basis, rather than as a spontaneous outcome or the exclusive responsibility of students.
Downloads
References
Alonso-Rodríguez, I. A., Pérez-Jorge, D., Pérez-Pérez, I., & Olmos-Raya, E. (2025). Restorative practices in reducing school violence: A systematic review of positive impacts on emotional wellbeing. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1520137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1520137
CASEL. (2020). CASEL’s SEL framework: What are the core competence areas and where are they promoted? Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. https://casel.org/casel.sel-framework-11-2020/
Castro, C., Barata, M. C., & Alexandre, J. (2025). Does school climate affect students’ social and emotional skills? The importance of relationships. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 40, Article 111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-025-01007-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-025-01007-8
Cipriano, C., Strambler, M. J., Naples, L. H., Ha, C., Kirk, M., Wood, M., Sehgal, K., Zieher, A., Eveleigh, A., McCarthy, M., Funaro, M., Ponnock, A., & Chow, J. (2023). The state of evidence for social and emotional learning: A contemporary meta-analysis of universal school-based SEL interventions. Child Development, 94(5), 1181–1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13968 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13968
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (s. f.). What is SEL? https://casel.org/what-is-sel/
Davies, C. A., Cordier, R., Graham, P., Littlefair, D., Speyer, R., & Melo, D. (2025). Interventions to improve connectedness, belonging, and engagement in secondary schools: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Education Sciences, 15(5), 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050582
Gregory, A., Huang, F. L., & Ward-Seidel, A. R. (2024). Adolescent exposure to restorative practices and their perceptions of support, structure, and bullying in the school climate. AERA Open, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241288525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241288525
Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693
Li, A., Miller, F. G., & Williams, S. C. (2025). Cultural adaptations to social-emotional learning programs: A systematic review. School Psychology, 40(2), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000649
Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. (2024). Acompañamiento socioemocional. Recursos educativos. https://recursos.educacion.gob.ec/red/acompanamiento-socioemocional/
Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. (2024). Acuerdo Nro. MINEDUC-MINEDUC-2024-00085-A: Se expide la Guía Práctica de Acompañamiento Socioemocional en el Sistema Nacional de Educación. https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2024/11/MINEDUC-MINEDUC-2024-00085-A.pdf
Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. (2024). Guía práctica de acompañamiento socioemocional en el Sistema Nacional de Educación. https://recursos.educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2024/Jorge/Guia%20Socioemocional%20FINAL.pdf
OECD. (2024b). Social and emotional skills for better lives: Findings from the OECD Survey on Social and Emotional Skills 2023. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/35ca7b7c-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/35ca7b7c-en
OECD. (2024a). Nurturing social and emotional learning across the globe: Findings from the OECD Survey on Social and Emotional Skills 2023. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/32b647d0-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/32b647d0-en
Shi, J., & Cheung, A. C. K. (2024). Effective components of social emotional learning programs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 53(4), 755–771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-024-01942-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Andrea Tatiana Cabezas Reyes, Rommel Alberto Arias Zamora, Édison Iván Enríquez Mosquera

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










